I recently set up a Google news alert for articles on GP practice boundaries.
It threw this article up this morning.
“Monitor senior policy adviser Paul Dinkin, the man heading its primary care consultation, said his initial conclusion was that Monitor would play a major part in primary care.”
“Mr Dinkin said his review was looking at barriers to entry into general practice, such as practice boundaries and registered lists.”
“He said the BMA and the RCGP were wrong to say general practice needed more funding. ‘Our suspicion is not more money for the current model, but to rethink who does what.'”
And my suspicion is that Mr Dinkin does not know a great deal about the ecology of general practice, and that he has little interest in finding out.
Checking on the Monitor website, I found a Call for evidence on general practice services sector in England. Issued on 1 July 2013, deadline for responses 1 August 2013. So I won’t be offering my views.
Who is Paul Dinkin and what is his background? I could find precious little online. Even on Monitor’s website there is no information.
Can we have some transparency, please?